Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
女主和傲骨之战里面那个有个破产老爹的红发女长得好像，看有好多人在批评这个BE结局有点难接受，是不是也从侧面反映了大环境越来越不好的情况下，电影甚至成为了一部分人赖以期望新生活的吗啡，我们不是看不得BE，我们只是看不得那些与我们的日常生活相似得可怕的悲哀。
一见钟情？爱情输给了宗教信仰？结婚有娃了还能再在一起吗？
左小人有得姬片看就不错了，右小人拍得如此无趣真的不行。（怎么翻来覆去还是唯美刻意，苦大仇深
一开头在京都的夜游中賢二的有个举动就让人literally“噗”地笑出来了 太可爱了 这次想模仿的菜式是蛤蜊鱼汤 高级鱼用冰箱里还有的那块冰冻比目鱼代替一下 希望明天能抢到蛤蜊 番茄和香料没有就算了
内野先生的做姿扮相总让我出戏分神 过了？
虽然今年刚刚过半，但是我觉得这部应该是今年年度最佳lgbt电影了（个人来说）
像一口气看了很多集小短剧，原作风格不适合拍成电影，这个效果已经很不错了。看完被不属于我的幸福包围了！呜呜呜这俩人真好，即将回归狂看漫画。
玛丽卡的锅盖刘海真的让我不得不联想到美恐/不娶何撩/片子真没有把两人感情叙述好看起来没谈几天哪有那么深的感情/一直以为要在家里被发现没找到在大街上就亲起来了/好好讲爱情咱能不能别扯宗教
十年了 爷终于又嗑上cp了😭 肯鸡真是世界上最好的1 我想跟走在这里的每个人都炫耀你的好😭😭😭
哪里都好，就是这个结局苦死了，越看越像违命前传（不是/捂脸哭哭…两个人的火花和性张力都快呲我脸上了，演得真好
哎呀还是挺甜的。虽然整体上故事框架较为老套。
做菜部分拍的挺不错。
看的时候想起了《Disobedience》，信仰的力量这么强大吗?
其实剧情是有点神叨的宗教部分，不过画面太美，人也好看，俩人也挺有cp感。
我不喜欢，我个人不喜欢，不希望这种恋情出现在任何一对女女，男女，男男身上。
是我的问题吗？两个中年男人谈清水恋爱，放剧集是可爱，放剧场版就变成了又臭又长，另外把贤二演得“硬装很娘”“矫揉造作”的样子也让人生理不适
好青涩好可爱！（主要是因为太吃两位的颜了）杰米真的拉拉典范穿着，红的绿的黄的各种法兰绒格子衬衫，还有一直戴着的拉拉帽hhh
在这样糟烂的时刻里，真真切切地给了我两个小时的治愈
终于把电影版看了 虽然没有电视剧版本的好看 剧情更平淡无奇 但是为什么贤二那么好笑
就还好，厕所里喊jamie背过去那一段嘶哈嘶哈
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
