Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
编剧这样瞎编，编故事前都不看看百度百科吗。很狗血的爱情故事，婚外情全被写的很唯美，难已置信，三观不正。反而全片没有太多描写埃菲尔铁塔。
作为会看之物和被看之目光的铁塔，以注视功能的无限循环象征了巴黎。因其无用性而逃脱理性束缚得以成为一个完整的梦幻的纪念物。
爱情线没什么意思，十有八九是牵强附会，巴黎版墙头马上，最后还cp脑地将埃菲尔铁塔的A形结构和Adrinne的A联系起来，简直是败笔中的败笔，简直玷污结构力学之美。但是，埃菲尔铁塔的建造过程很有意思，Gustuve Eiffel本人在建筑结构上取得的成就非常令人敬佩和鼓舞，会让人短暂忘记生活中的柴米油盐，找回一些年轻时如“横渠四句”般的豪情壮志。// 6/6/2022 感觉不是很吸引人的样子，但图个清静吧。
不咋样，完全感觉不到啥恐怖氛围！有实体有血条的能叫鬼?那叫野怪！还有那笑声鬼，老实讲她每次出现我都有种想给她两个大耳巴子问她:能不能笑着的正常点！
穿越的有点扯，通灵还穿越了。恐怖氛围还行，和昆池岩比差多了
半小时直接弃，浪费时间，现在鬼片都拍的什么玩意
Où puis-je regarder ce film ?
一段并不成功的爱情故事和一座修成正果的地标性建筑 作为学过建筑建构的建筑生 看到主人公在电影里不断描结构外侧感觉很出戏 整部电影没有特别抓人的高潮部分 也没有特别瞩目的短板 下次再去巴黎的时候 也许会对埃菲尔铁塔有多一重认识
6分真的不能再高了…剧本有问题，导演的“碗”其实就没有扣住主题，人物刻画上很法国，身份上的落差并没有表现的很突出，两人的爱情很炙热，但是艺术上没啥升华…就是一部很过时的影片。
试图整点不一样的新鲜玩意儿，但展现出来的却只有凌乱不堪，尤其核心效果完全稀碎，唉
首先 要能看清画面才能开始讨论好不好看这件事儿 无语
太暗了加上剪辑稀碎，看的人很无语。然后主角拉胯，加上类似于昆池岩的镜头晃得头晕😵
在工程奇迹面前，人类个体的那点情爱实在不值一提，何况纠葛接近狗血。与其浪费时间讲爱情故事，不如尊重一下其它设计，别轻浮地取笑一笔带过，讲讲其它投标方案的设计思想，它们不论贤愚也都反映了当时的思想风气，观念理想的碰撞、智力技巧的比拼，远比爱情宏大，离开爱情不会讲人生故事，导演们实在娘娘腔的矫情，我们等一部技术宅角度的伟大电影等得太久了，哪怕这电影制作扎实，也实在让人想手动差评。爱情是我们普通人没法创造伟大作品的寄托，对伟大作品创造者，爱情就是点缀，插曲。
这么弱都还敢独自去驱魔，高手这是高手啊，还有太多bug了根本很多细节都圆不了，譬如他妈妈撕掉的那一页究竟有啥用啊，还这么多镜头，不过有一说一，恐怖效果做得还是挺不错的，特别是那只女鬼，恐怖的阴影伴随着我两天
本来想给2星，最后，1星吧……故弄玄虚到最后我也没看明白，非要去送命？
不同的时间线遇见相同的鬼，本身的叙事设定相比其他恐怖片好不少，但效果没有发挥到极致
有点意思，但也就仅此而已了，深究就有点经不起推敲了。
垃圾电影，前30分钟像弱智一样，看了想睡觉，果断关了！
太黑了，最近看的怪奇宅还可以，一个个故事，有点串联，还算传统。。。我也想到了两个月亮，年代久远。。。有人和昆池岩比，昆池岩吓人吗，直播形式看的更乱，也不吓人。。。这部还可以。。
看得出用了心 道具音效够吓人 但是男主是无干嘛的？我反正是忘了 我猜导演也忘了。。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
